| 1. | Sql server does not support restrictions from union types
Sql server不支持联合类型的限制。 |
| 2. | Union types as list items
作为列表项的联合类型 |
| 3. | Any simple type , except for a list or union type , is atomic
除列表类型或联合类型以外的所有简单类型都是原子类型。 |
| 4. | List types and union types
列表类型和联合类型 |
| 5. | Sql server does not support list types that use union types as list items
Sql server不支持将联合类型作为列表项使用的列表类型。 |
| 6. | That use an xml schema restriction element . sql server does not support union types with
Sql server不支持将xs : qname作为成员元素的联合类型。 |
| 7. | Union types are always derived types and must comprise at least two alternative datatypes
联合类型始终是派生类型，必须至少包含两种替代数据类型。 |
| 8. | Currently , sql server does not support schemas that contain list types with union type items
当前sql server不支持包含带有联合类型项的列表类型的架构。 |
| 9. | The following example schema illustrates an attempt to support the use of a union type within a list item type
以下示例架构说明尝试支持列表项类型中的联合类型的使用： |
| 10. | By the use of an xml schema restriction element . currently , sql server does not support union types with
Sql server不会通过使用xml架构限制元素来支持从xs : qname派生的类型。 |
